Race Conditions: Engineering for Vibe Coders
Some of the hardest bugs to find only happen sometimes.
You run the same action twice and get two different results.
Everything works in development, but fails under load.
The bug disappears when you add logging.
That is usually a race condition.
Race conditions happen when the correctness of your system depends on timing. If operations run in a different order than you expected, things break.
What a Race Condition Is
A race condition occurs when multiple operations access shared state and the final result depends on which one runs first.
Common examples include:
- Two requests updating the same record at the same time
- A background job running while a user action is still in progress
- Multiple workers processing the same message
- A check followed by a write that is not atomic
If timing matters for correctness, you have a race condition risk.
🟢 Pre-prototype habit:
List all places where two actions could touch the same data at the same time.
Why Race Conditions Matter for Vibe Coders
Vibe coding tools generate code that assumes a single, happy path execution.
Real systems are concurrent by default:
- Multiple users
- Background jobs
- Retries
- Parallel requests
Race conditions often appear only after launch, which makes them expensive and embarrassing.
They are also hard to reproduce, which makes them easy to dismiss.
🟢 Pre-prototype habit:
Assume every important action can happen twice at the same time and ask what breaks.
Common Places Race Conditions Appear
Race conditions tend to show up in predictable areas:
- Counters and totals
- Status transitions
- Inventory or quota tracking
- Payment or credit updates
- Session or state updates
The classic pattern is read, check, then write without protection.
🟢 Pre-prototype habit:
Identify any logic that reads a value, makes a decision, and then writes a new value.
Race Conditions vs Performance Bugs
Race conditions are correctness bugs, not performance issues.
The system may be fast and still wrong.
Adding delays, retries, or more hardware does not fix race conditions. It often makes them worse by increasing concurrency.
The fix is coordination, not speed.
🟢 Pre-prototype habit:
Decide which operations must be serialized or made atomic before coding them.
Preventing Race Conditions by Design
Good design reduces race conditions before code exists.
Techniques include:
- Atomic operations
- Database constraints
- Locks or mutexes
- Idempotent operations
- Single writer patterns
- Clear ownership of state
The goal is to make invalid states impossible, not just unlikely.
🟢 Pre-prototype habit:
Write down which component is allowed to change each piece of shared state.
Race Conditions and Testing
Race conditions are hard to test because they are timing dependent.
They often:
- Disappear when debugging
- Only appear under load
- Fail intermittently
This is why design matters more than tests for race conditions.
Tests can catch some issues, but architecture prevents most of them.
🟢 Pre-prototype habit:
Plan how you would simulate concurrency and failure before writing code.
Race Conditions Are Trust Killers
Nothing erodes trust faster than a system that behaves inconsistently.
Users may forgive slow responses.
They rarely forgive incorrect ones.
Race conditions make systems feel random, which is worse than being broken.
If you think about concurrency early, race conditions become rare instead of mysterious.
That is the difference between a demo and a dependable system.
See the full list of free resources for vibe coders!
Still have questions or want to talk about your projects or your plans? Set up a free 30 minute consultation with me!
